STUDENTS’ MOBILE TECHNOLOGY USAGE AND THEIR TOEFL LISTENING PROFICIENCY: A CORRELATIONAL STUDY

Wuri Alfi Nurwulandari, Afrianto Daud, Atni Prawati

Abstract


This research aimed to find out the correlation between students’ mobile technology usage and TOEFL listening proficiency in the sixth semester of the English Study Program of FKIP Universitas Riau. The sample of this study was 36 students in the sixth semester of the English Study Program of FKIP Universitas Riau. The Cluster Random sampling technique was utilized to choose the sample for this research. This study used two data instruments, a mobile technology usage questionnaire and TOEFL listening proficiency gained by collecting students’ TOEFL listening scores. The instruments were distributed to the respondents online through Google Forms. The mobile technology usage questionnaire was an adaptation of a questionnaire by Grenier. The respondents submitted the TOEFL listening score after finishing the questionnaire. The students’ mobile technology usage was analyzed using a Likert scale in the form of positive questions. The students’ proficiency levels were categorized using ETS Performance Descriptors for TOEFL. The researcher used the Pearson Product Moment formula to determine the correlation coefficient value. The result of this study shows that most respondents’ listening proficiency is categorized at the elementary level with a range score of the listening section 31-46. Moreover, this study revealed a moderate correlation between students’ mobile technology usage and their TOEFL listening proficiency, with a 36% determinant score. In other words, mobile technology usage is not the main factor in determining students’ TOEFL listening proficiency. 


Keywords


Correlation; mobile technology; TOEFL; listening proficiency

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abboud, Z. A. R., & Hussein, N. J. (2011). The difficulties faced by advanced Iraqi foreign learners in passing ITP TOEFL test. In Journal of Basra Researches for Human Sciences, 36(4), 110-138. https://www.iasj.net/iasj?func=fulltext&aId58655

Ally, Mohamed. (2009). Mobile learning: Transforming the delivery of education and training, Athabasca University Press

Angelia, I., & Simanjuntak, D. C. (2023). The use of digital audio in enhancing EFL learners’ listening proficiency. JETAL: Journal of English Teaching & Applied Linguistics. (Vol.4). https://doi.org/10.36655/jetal.v4i2.1118

Bachore, M. M. (2015). Language learning through mobile technologies: An opportunity for language learners and teachers. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(31), 50–53. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1083417.pdf

Bloomfield, A., Wayland, S., Rhoades, E., Blodgett, A., Linck, J. A., Ross, S. J. (2010). What makes listening difficult? Factors affecting second language listening comprehension. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada550176

Bozorgian, H. (2012). Listening skill requires a further look into second/foreign language learning. ISRN Education, 2012, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/810129

Cho, Y., & Bridgeman, B. (2012). Relationship of TOEFL iBT® scores to academic performance: Some evidence from American universities. Language Testing, 29(3), 421–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532211430368

Creswell, J. (2015). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (5th ed.). New York: Pearson.

Gay, L.R., Mills, G.E., Airasian, P.W. (2010). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (10th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc. ISBN: 10:0-13-261317-4

Grenier, D.P. (2018) The Relationship between mobile learning and academic achievement in a community college system online environment (Doctoral dissertation, Liberty University, Lynchburg, Virginia). Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/doctoral/1672/

Kacetl, J., & Klímová, B. (2019). Use of smartphone applications in English language learning—A challenge for foreign language education. Education Sciences. 9(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030179

Klimova, B. (2019). Impact of mobile learning on students’ achievement results. Education Sciences, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020090

Phillips, D. (2001). Longman complete course for the TOEFL test. Pearson Education.

Schober, P., & Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 126(5), 1763–1768. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864

Taleb, Z., & Sohrabi, A. (2012). Learning on the move: The use of mobile technology to support learning for university students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 1102–1109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.038

The Educational Testing Service. (2011). Performance descriptors for the TOEFL iBT® test. Retrieved from https://www.ets.org/pdfs/toefl/toefl-ibt-performance-descriptors.pdf.

Tyagi, B. (2013). Listening: An important skill and its various aspects. The Criterion: An International Journal in English, (12), 1–8. Retrieved from www.the-criterion.com

Utomo, A., & Damayanti, P. (2019). Bentuk tes TOEFL untuk mahasiswa Universitas Kaltara: Studi kualitatif. Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora, 20(2), 59-66.

Yang, K., & Miller, G. (2008). Handbook of research methods in public administration. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis Group.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31258/ijebp.v7n2.p189-202

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 International Journal of Educational Best Practices

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.