THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING GRAMMARLY ON HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS' WRITING QUALITY

Khairum Nisa Jelita, Afrianto Daud, Masyhur Masyhur

Abstract


Grammarly has got a lot of attention among academics especially because it is a powerful tool that can be used by writers to improve their writing quality. They need it as a medium for correcting writing errors. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of using Grammarly on the students' writing quality of the eleventh-grade students at SMA Negeri 1 Ujung Batu. In particular, this study explores if there is any significant effect of Grammarly on students' writing quality in terms of grammatical accuracy, capitalization, spelling, and punctuation. This is quantitative research using the pre-experimental method. The subject consists of 30 students selected using a purposive sampling technique. The data were collected from a pre-test and a post-test of writing an explanation text written before and after being corrected using Grammarly. The hypothesis test was conducted using Wilcoxon Test. The result shows an alternative hypothesis which is the Asymp. Sig. is 0.00<0.05. So, Grammarly has a significant effect on students' writing quality in eleventh grade at SMA Negeri 1 Ujung Batu. This study implies that Grammarly can be useful as a learning media as self-editing for students to improve their writing ability.


Keywords


Effectiveness; Writing Quality; Grammarly

Full Text:

PDF

References


Azzah. (2019). The Effectiveness of Grammarly Checker towards Students’ Writing Quality of the Fourth Semester of English Department at IAIN Tulungagung. http://repo.iain-tulungagung.ac.id/12020/

British, C. (2023). The Main Differences Between English and Indonesian. Retrieved from British Council Foundation: https://www.britishcouncilfoundation.id/en/english/articles/language-main-differences

Fadhilah Umu, Lizawati, Dolok S. H. J. (2019). Effectiveness of Grammarly application for writing abstract. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 8(12). https://doi.org/10.21275/ART20202994

Fitria, T. N. (2021). Error analysis found in students’ writing composition in simple past tense of recount text. ENGLISH FRANCE: Academic Journal of English Language and Education, 4(2), 141. https://doi.org/10.31002/metathesis.v5i1.3519

Fitriani. (2020). The implementation of grammarly tool to boost students' writing skill of analytical exposition. Jakarta: FITK UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. http://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/51828

Grammarly. (2017). About Grammarly. Retrieved from https://support.grammarly.com/hc/en-us/categories/115000018611-AboutGrammarly.

Kalsum. (2020). The 6+1 trait writing model to build up students' writing. Eduvelop: Journal of English Education and Development, 4(1), 23-30. https://ojs.unsulbar.ac.id/index.php/eduvelop/article/view/799/452

Karyuatry, L. (2018). Grammarly as a tool to improve students' writing quality: free online-proofreader across the boundaries. Journal Sains Sosial dan Humaniora, 2(1), 83-89. https://doi.org/10.30595/jssh.v2i1.2297

Kemendikbud. (2017). Model Pengembangan RPP. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Sekolah Menengah. https://www.academia.edu/37172363/02_Model_Pengembangan_RPP_2017_pdf_pdf

Kumala, B. P. (2018). An analysis of grammatical errors on students' writing. English Language and Literature International Conference. https://jurnal.unimus.ac.id/index.php/ELLIC/article/view/3513

Nova, M. (2018). Utilizing grammarly in evaluating academic writing: a narrative research on efl students’ experience. Premise: Journal of English Education and Applied Linguistics, 7, 80-96. https://fkip.ummetro.ac.id/journal/index.php/english

Nunan, D. (2003). Practical English Language Teaching. New York: McGraw-Hill.

McNamara, D. S., Crossley, S. A., & McCarthy, P. M. (2010). Linguistics features of writing quality. Written Communication, 57-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088309351547

Moore, B. (2018). Grammarly. PCMAG. https://www.pcmag.com/reviews/grammarly

Mubarok, A., & Syafi'i, A. (2020). Grammarly: An online efl writing companion. ELTICS : Journal of English Language Teaching and English Linguistics, 5(2). https://journal.upy.ac.id/index.php/eltics/article/download/912/747

Otake, S. (2022). What do EFL students experience while editing? Bulletin of Kobe Gakuin University Global Communication Society, 7. http://doi.org/10.32129/00000198

Parra G., L., & Calero S., X. (2019). Automated writing evaluation tools in the improvement of the writing skill. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 209-226. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12214a

Pratama, Y. D. (n.d.). The investigation of using grammarly as online checker in the process of writing. English Ideas: Journal of English Language Education, 1(1). https://journal.unsika.ac.id/index.php/IDEAS/article/view/4180

Refnaldi. (2010). Essays Writing: A Process Genre Based Approach. UNN Press. http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/isla/article/viewFile/4717/3687

Regie, R. (2005). Writing Essential: Raising Expectation and Result while Simplifying Teacher. Portsmouth: NH: Heinemann.

Soegiyarto, M. S., Putri, R. A., & Saputra, S. D. (2018). The Importance of Getting Automated Grammar Feedback via Grammarly, for Increasing Students' English Language Proficiency. Universitas Airlangga. https://osf.io/749a2/download/?format=pdf

Baroto, M. A. A. (2017). The effects of language input, learning environment, and motivation toward second language acquisition. LET: Linguistics, Literature, And English Teaching Journal, 6(2), 1–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.18592/let.v6i2.1456

Hamonangan, R. P. (2020). Daya tarik kampung inggris pare sebagai tujuan pembelajaran bahasa [The attraction of Pare English village as a language learning destination]. Jurnal Gama Societa, Vol.4(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.22146/jgs.63893

Krashen, S. (1988). Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. Prentice-Hall International.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31258/ijebp.v7n1.p43-55

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 International Journal of Educational Best Practices

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.